Join the 2022 Full-Stack Web Dev Bootcamp!
A dictionary stores [key, value] pairs. Go provides a very convenient implementation of a dictionary by its built-in map type.
In this article I’ll enrich the map built-in type with some convenient operations to get information out of it, and to change its content.
I’ll create a ItemDictionary generic type, concurrency safe, that can generate dictionaries for any type. By running genny the code will create a type-specific Dictionary implementation, encapsulating the actual map containing the data.
Goal
The dictionary is created using dict := ValueDictionary{} and provides this set of exported methods:
Set()Delete()Has()Get()Clear()Size()Keys()Values()
Implementation
// Package dictionary creates a ValueDictionary data structure for the Item type
package dictionary
import (
"sync"
"github.com/cheekybits/genny/generic"
)
// Key the key of the dictionary
type Key generic.Type
// Value the content of the dictionary
type Value generic.Type
// ValueDictionary the set of Items
type ValueDictionary struct {
items map[Key]Value
lock sync.RWMutex
}
// Set adds a new item to the dictionary
func (d *ValueDictionary) Set(k Key, v Value) {
d.lock.Lock()
defer d.lock.Unlock()
if d.items == nil {
d.items = make(map[Key]Value)
}
d.items[k] = v
}
// Delete removes a value from the dictionary, given its key
func (d *ValueDictionary) Delete(k Key) bool {
d.lock.Lock()
defer d.lock.Unlock()
_, ok := d.items[k]
if ok {
delete(d.items, k)
}
return ok
}
// Has returns true if the key exists in the dictionary
func (d *ValueDictionary) Has(k Key) bool {
d.lock.RLock()
defer d.lock.RUnlock()
_, ok := d.items[k]
return ok
}
// Get returns the value associated with the key
func (d *ValueDictionary) Get(k Key) Value {
d.lock.RLock()
defer d.lock.RUnlock()
return d.items[k]
}
// Clear removes all the items from the dictionary
func (d *ValueDictionary) Clear() {
d.lock.Lock()
defer d.lock.Unlock()
d.items = make(map[Key]Value)
}
// Size returns the amount of elements in the dictionary
func (d *ValueDictionary) Size() int {
d.lock.RLock()
defer d.lock.RUnlock()
return len(d.items)
}
// Keys returns a slice of all the keys present
func (d *ValueDictionary) Keys() []Key {
d.lock.RLock()
defer d.lock.RUnlock()
keys := []Key{}
for i := range d.items {
keys = append(keys, i)
}
return keys
}
// Values returns a slice of all the values present
func (d *ValueDictionary) Values() []Value {
d.lock.RLock()
defer d.lock.RUnlock()
values := []Value{}
for i := range d.items {
values = append(values, d.items[i])
}
return values
}Tests
The tests describe the usage of the above implementation. Notice that we never interact with the underlying map type, which might as well be implemented in another way if only Go didn’t provide us a map type already.
package dictionary
import (
"fmt"
"testing"
)
func populateDictionary(count int, start int) *ValueDictionary {
dict := ValueDictionary{}
for i := start; i < (start + count); i++ {
dict.Set(fmt.Sprintf("key%d", i), fmt.Sprintf("value%d", i))
}
return &dict
}
func TestSet(t *testing.T) {
dict := populateDictionary(3, 0)
if size := dict.Size(); size != 3 {
t.Errorf("wrong count, expected 3 and got %d", size)
}
dict.Set("key1", "value1") //should not add a new one, just change the existing one
if size := dict.Size(); size != 3 {
t.Errorf("wrong count, expected 3 and got %d", size)
}
dict.Set("key4", "value4") //should add it
if size := dict.Size(); size != 4 {
t.Errorf("wrong count, expected 4 and got %d", size)
}
}
func TestDelete(t *testing.T) {
dict := populateDictionary(3, 0)
dict.Delete("key2")
if size := dict.Size(); size != 2 {
t.Errorf("wrong count, expected 2 and got %d", size)
}
}
func TestClear(t *testing.T) {
dict := populateDictionary(3, 0)
dict.Clear()
if size := dict.Size(); size != 0 {
t.Errorf("wrong count, expected 0 and got %d", size)
}
}
func TestHas(t *testing.T) {
dict := populateDictionary(3, 0)
has := dict.Has("key2")
if !has {
t.Errorf("expected key2 to be there")
}
dict.Delete("key2")
has = dict.Has("key2")
if has {
t.Errorf("expected key2 to be removed")
}
dict.Delete("key1")
has = dict.Has("key1")
if has {
t.Errorf("expected key1 to be removed")
}
}
func TestKeys(t *testing.T) {
dict := populateDictionary(3, 0)
items := dict.Keys()
if len(items) != 3 {
t.Errorf("wrong count, expected 3 and got %d", len(items))
}
dict = populateDictionary(520, 0)
items = dict.Keys()
if len(items) != 520 {
t.Errorf("wrong count, expected 520 and got %d", len(items))
}
}
func TestValues(t *testing.T) {
dict := populateDictionary(3, 0)
items := dict.Values()
if len(items) != 3 {
t.Errorf("wrong count, expected 3 and got %d", len(items))
}
dict = populateDictionary(520, 0)
items = dict.Values()
if len(items) != 520 {
t.Errorf("wrong count, expected 520 and got %d", len(items))
}
}
func TestSize(t *testing.T) {
dict := populateDictionary(3, 0)
items := dict.Values()
if len(items) != dict.Size() {
t.Errorf("wrong count, expected %d and got %d", dict.Size(), len(items))
}
dict = populateDictionary(0, 0)
items = dict.Values()
if len(items) != dict.Size() {
t.Errorf("wrong count, expected %d and got %d", dict.Size(), len(items))
}
dict = populateDictionary(10000, 0)
items = dict.Values()
if len(items) != dict.Size() {
t.Errorf("wrong count, expected %d and got %d", dict.Size(), len(items))
}
}Creating a concrete dictionary data structure
You can use this generic implemenation to generate type-specific dictionaries, using
//generate a `IntDictionary` dictionary of `string` keys associated to `int` values
genny -in dictionary.go -out dictionary-string-int.go gen "Key=string Value=int"
//generate a `StringDictionary` dictionary of `string` keys associated to `string` values
genny -in dictionary.go -out dictionary-string-string.go gen "Key=string Value=string"Want to become a better Web Developer? Join the 2022 Web Development Bootcamp!