Finish and test the board

Core issue reading and submission work without Alpine; enhancement adds filtering, feedback, and convenience without blocking the task. This is a small part of an accessible issue board that filters, edits, persists, and progressively enhances server-rendered HTML, but the boundary it creates affects everything that follows.

Progressive enhancement is demonstrated by failure behavior and user outcomes, not by the presence of server-rendered HTML alone. The useful target is not encyclopedic coverage. Make one deliberate choice, observe its consequences, and know which requirement would make you revise it.

Watch for one shortcut in particular: trying to test only the fully loaded happy path with a mouse. It makes later failures harder to locate. Instead, write a matrix across input methods, network states, reduced motion, storage state, and script availability. Prefer an implementation you can explain from the outside before optimizing it.

Keep the wider goal in view: Finish the issue board as a progressively enhanced interface that remains understandable with keyboard, assistive technology, slow networks, and JavaScript failure. A short observation with concrete evidence is more useful than a confident sentence with no reproduction path.

Complete the board and record evidence for each matrix row, including one limitation you chose not to hide. Hand the result to someone else and see whether the behavior is clear without an oral explanation.