Finish the accessibility report

The report links evidence to user tasks, records assistive technology versions, and assigns remaining work with retest dates. This is a small part of a deliberately flawed event-registration page that is audited, repaired, and retested with real evidence, but the boundary it creates affects everything that follows.

A credible report says what was tested and what was not, rather than declaring the product accessible forever. The useful target is not encyclopedic coverage. Make one deliberate choice, observe its consequences, and know which requirement would make you revise it.

Watch for one shortcut in particular: trying to publish a perfect score without scope, test conditions, or known limitations. It makes later failures harder to locate. Instead, write an honest evidence-based report and integrate accessibility into design, implementation, review, and release. Prefer an implementation you can explain from the outside before optimizing it.

Keep the wider goal in view: Turn the repaired page into a repeatable accessibility practice rather than a one-time cleanup. A short observation with concrete evidence is more useful than a confident sentence with no reproduction path.

Compare the original and repaired registration task, then hand the report and regression matrix to another tester. Hand the result to someone else and see whether the behavior is clear without an oral explanation.